The gripping ‘Saints & Strangers’ strips the sentimentality from the first …

21 Nov 2015 | Author: | No comments yet »

‘Mad Man’s’ Vincent Kartheiser sets sail for a whole new world in ‘Saints & Strangers’.

If your idea of the first Thanksgiving consists of sentimental images of Pilgrims and Native Americans sitting down together at a well-stocked table, you owe it to yourself to watch “Saints & Strangers,” a four-hour, two-night, made-for-TV movie that premieres Sunday, Nov. 22. Depending on your viewpoint, it is either fitting or ironic that a heightened debate over various immigration issues should occur in the U.S. during the month of November.Thanksgiving arrives just in time to remind us that we’re all pretty much strangers here, in one or way another, even the people hollering about closing the door to newcomers.In case this part of the story was missing from your child’s grade-school Thanksgiving pageant, TV is here to tell us this holiday week that the Pilgrims were a bunch of grave-robbing, food-stealing killers who lured a Native American leader to what he thought was a meal of peace, only to cut off his head and stick it on a pole.William Bradford (Vincent Kartheiser), center, leads the Pilgrims to dry land in “Saints & Stangers,” National Geographic Channel’s two-night movie airing at 9 p.m.

This ambitious production from the National Geographic Channel takes us back to 1620, and makes us feel what it may have been like sailing from England on the Mayflower; trying to establish the Plymouth Colony; and how members of the already established Native American tribes might react to the arrival of the interlopers. The United States proudly defines itself as a nation of immigrants, and nothing makes this more clear than our affection for the story of Thanksgiving. The Mayflower carries both travelers who turned away from the Church of England to follow their rigidly separatist vision of religious freedom, and mercenaries who have good reason to get the heck out of England and pursue their fortune in the New World. He’s William Bradford, the Mayflower’s spiritual captain, who finds time between prayers to become the five-time governor of the Plymouth Colony, a role that required him to trade in those sleek suits for dingy duds and grow a beard that looks as if it could house a family of prairie dogs. Fleeing a repressive religious state, a small group of refugees relocated to what is now Massachusetts, where, with the aid of friendly natives, they fought the odds (and non-friendly natives) to plant the seeds of this great nation.

Since the Emmy-winning series, Kartheiser has followed the trajectory of the promising shooting star: marrying a popular actress, “Gilmore Girls” graduate Alexis Bledel; spurring brisk ticket sales to gawkers for the Guthrie Theater’s 2013 production of “Pride and Prejudice”; abandoning plans to move back to the Twin Cities, and building a reputation for playing cat-and-mouse with the media. Weather instead drove them two months later to what Plymouth’s future governor William Bradford called a “desolate wilderness” much farther north.

Papermag.com once posted a piece titled “A Brief History of Vincent Kartheiser Acting Weird.” But during a phone interview this month, Kartheiser was the same chatty, self-deprecating, witty dynamo I met while window shopping on Rodeo Drive in 2007, just before “Mad Men” premiered and changed his life. View Archive Vincent Kartheiser stars as William Bradford (indeed, behind that beard and Prince Valiant bob and smoky eyeliner, it’s Pete from “Mad Men,” doing his best to branch out), the religious separatist who eventually becomes the governor of New Plymouth. Bradford is played by Vincent Kartheiser (Pete Campbell in “Mad Men,” but with piercing raccoon eyes), whose performance makes Bradford as luminous as his prose. In light of what followed in American history, it’s heartbreaking and suspenseful to watch Massasoit (Raoul Trujillo), leader of the Wampanoag tribe, weigh his choices.

Desolation was also the state of much of the land the English found, where disease, the result of earlier contact with European traders, had depopulated Native villages and decimated entire tribes. And though neither are particularly notable examples of their genre, they are welcome additions, and perhaps antidotes, to a historic holiday increasingly driven by gluttony and football. Yet what makes this film so sad in many places is also part of its poignant beauty as it seeks to tell what it can of the Indian experience of settlers.

The performances are generally strong, with Kalani Queypo a standout as Squanto, the English-speaking member of the Patuxet who, after having been kidnapped and sold into slavery in England, managed to return to America. A: The idea that you would die rather than go against the word of God is foreign to my own personal experience, and I didn’t want to bring in my own religious beliefs, which are quite different. Used as companion pieces, they should make excellent viewing for families able to persuade their children to watch historic dramas and/or documentaries.

Bradford’s voice, performed by Roger Rees in his last role before his death in July, not only drives the production, it gives it a poetic, even elegiac tone. Native tribes had already seen their own killed by diseases brought by newcomers, and after Squanto’s people were wiped out, he made an alliance with the Wampanoag, and became a crucial liaison between Massasoit and the settlers. I think you just have to imagine this sense of commitment as a small ball of twine and keep wrapping yourself around it until it gets larger and larger in your psyche. With the benefit of more time and literary license, “Saints” is better able to portray the horrific suffering of the settlers, who are beset by hunger, disease and despair both on and then off the Mayflower, while also giving voice to the actual “first” Americans. The dying doesn’t stop once they’re on land, either. (The brutal commitment to killing off main characters on “The Walking Dead” suddenly doesn’t seem like such a vanguard approach.) Although I love the idea of telling the Pilgrim story in a grim, more accurate way, “Saints & Strangers” still falls prey to some usual miniseries melodrama and awkward exposition.

Ray Stevenson is gruff and imposing as the roguish Stephen Hopkins, whose brushes with the law make the Mayflower voyage a good idea, even if he regards the pious Pilgrims with disdain. Among the first things the pilgrims do upon landing is take corn they find buried at what they thought was an abandoned village and dig up two graves.

Even though there is more historical re-enactment than is typical for them, the staples of any production by either of the Burns brothers are included. The settlers, led by William Bradford, held a meeting with other tribal leaders ostensibly to forge peace, but instead the English turned on them during the meal.

Both intriguing films leave you with a similar depressing impression – that the Plymouth experiment was far grimmer, grimier and gorier than we were led to believe in those innocent elementary-school days. O’Byrne as John Billington, Tatanka Means as the ready-for-war Hobbamock, Barry Sloane as Edward Winslow, and Natascha McElhome as Elizabeth Hopkins, who was apparently a fashion forerunner, with her anachronistic long tresses and wide-brimmed hippie hat.

With good intentions, the series is attempting to correct the massive mythological construct that has become our standard feel-good narrative of Thanksgiving. Don’t mind the opening sequence, which involves the non-Pilgrim “strangers” on the Mayflower yelling words like “bitch” to a soundtrack of retching. The Pilgrims, as they are called, are not the Mayflower’s only passengers; they are accompanied by a ragtag group of “strangers,” led by Stephen Hopkins (“Rome’s” Ray Stevenson) and others who are less bound by scripture and more concerned with survival, even if it means introducing the local Indian tribes to the business end of a musket. So the question becomes: What happened to the dead?” Donegan answers her own question with court testimony given by a man who arrived in 1623 and asked settlement members what they did with all the bodies during that winter of 1620. Ignore the mischievous hint that the settlers thrived once they abandoned greed and capitalism: The truth is that after starving for several years, Bradford and the others resolved to abandon their socialist experiment in communal ownership of everything and let each family have and work their own property—with a resulting lifesaving surge in production.

Much of this four-hour story involves the colonists’ constant debate about whether to wage war with the “savages” or to try to broker an accord. The film, co-executive produced and written by Eric Overmyer and Seth Fisher (from an original script by “Homeland‘s” Chip Johannessen, with revisions by Walon Green) is an often engrossing attempt to explore the way needful alliances between Indians and settlers may have had a transforming, even enlightening, effect on some of the English. “The Pilgrims” begins much earlier than the Nat Geo film, with the documentary in the PBS “American Experience” series spending fascinating time on the separatists’ experience in England and Holland.

In fact, the miniseries could have been winnowed to Kalani Queypo’s fascinating take on Squanto, the Patuxet Indian whose ability to speak both English and tribal languages pretty much is the Thanksgiving story. She also deconstructs a piece of false history later written by Increase Mather, father of the more widely remembered Cotton Mather, who claimed the Pilgrims buried their dead at night and planted corn over the graves that first winter to keep the Native Americans from knowing how many had died. In one section, for example, we learn that the New England Pilgrims and their story basically hijacked credit for America’s founding which really took place many years earlier in blighted Jamestown, Va.

A: One thing we learned is that the water was so bad in the United Kingdom in those days that everyone ordered eight glasses of beer a day, even 4-year-olds. As the many historians and writers interviewed for “The Pilgrims” repeatedly point out, the Puritans were what many modern Americans would consider religious zealots. Four hours of hard suffering may seem a bit much, but if it makes you feel a tiny bit more grateful to see it from the comforts of your couch, then it’s worth it.

A large group of them came into the village when settlers were bringing in the harvest, and happened to stay for a few days, eating and hunting and the like. The whole Plymouth Rock story has come to symbolize the first step toward a country, even though the Pilgrims came 13 years after the founding of Jamestown in 1607.

And even though an executive producer and a writer are straight off the “Killing” franchise, Eric Overmyer of “The Wire” and “Treme” is also credited as an executive producer. While we may not have been given the whole story as youngsters, we were taught something vital that resonates in both films: that this was a remarkable story of struggle, commitment, perseverance and survival. But it is important to note the change in the 25 years since “The Civil War” first aired in the kind of history TV is telling and who the principal storytellers are. That millions of viewers are getting their sense of who and what we were from the O’Reilly school, instead of Burns and his disciples, is a sea change.

In this age of identity politics, most of our focus seems to be only on the tribe to which we belong and how we think it is being treated or mistreated in American life. But I have to admit: It is going to take a while for me to think of this holiday with a bloody head sticking on a pole instead of “A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving.”

Here you can write a commentary on the recording "The gripping ‘Saints & Strangers’ strips the sentimentality from the first …".

* Required fields
Twitter-news
Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

About this site