JJ Abrams Explains Why We Need A Female ‘Star Wars’ Protagonist & Here Are 7 …

30 Nov 2015 | Author: | No comments yet »

‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ director J. J. Abrams wants girls to love movie, too.

Abrams is opening up about what fans of Star Wars can expect from the franchise reboot – something for everyone! “Star Wars was always a boys thing and a movie that dads took their sons to,” Abrams said during a Monday appearance on Good Morning America, “and though that’s still very much the case, I was really hoping this could be a movie that mothers take their daughters to as well.” The 49-year-old, who initially turned down the gig as director (“I thought maybe it’d be better just to go to the theater and see it like everybody else”), said there’s a reason he and the cast have kept mostly mum about the upcoming installment’s plot. “I don’t want to obviously ruin the movie for people and it’s so important to us that we not give too many details and sort of oversell it,” he admitted, “which is very hard with a movie like Star Wars.” The director would, however, discuss his inspiration: Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill), who has remained absent from the bulk of The Force Awakens promotional materials thus far. Questioned about whether the prequel would beat Titanic as America’s all-time box-office No 1 film, he dispensed Jedi wisdom: “This is not a contest.

While Abrams wouldn’t divulge in exactly what capacity Skywalker will appear in the film, Hamill recently told Empire that Luke is at a “very different time in his life.” “There are lots of surprises in this movie. That was really the beginning of the idea for this film.” That led to the casting of his two major new heroes — Daisy Ridley’s desert scavenger Rey and John Boyega’s reformed Stormtrooper Finn — who brought a little more gender balance and diversity to the galaxy. “I’m looking forward to kids seeing this movie and seeing themselves in it and capable of doing things that they never could have imagined possible,” said Abrams. Regardless of Hamill’s role, Abrams said on Monday that the film has an “extraordinary cast” and fans can expect to leave screenings feeling just as special as the big screen stars. “What I hope more than anything is that it’s something … that tells them that life is full of sort of unlimited possibilities,” Abrams said of younger audiences. “That they feel better when they leave than when they got in there.” But you suspect even he didn’t anticipate the Force-choke of expectation currently tweaking his trachea regarding The Force Awakens’ box-office performance (as if restoring the series’ quality wasn’t enough).

If he fails to steal Avatar’s $2.8bn crown as the most successful film ever, Abrams will be given about as sympathetic a treatment by certain entertainment news websites as one of Darth Vader’s spluttering minions. (By the way, Mr Vader, it’s worth considering that no sequel or prequel has ever been the US’s or the world’s highest-grossing film.) Something has happened in the movie world since the late 90s. Yet one of the 2015 members of the $1bn club, Avengers: Age of Ultron, the sixth highest-grossing film ever, was reportedly deemed a failure by Disney executives because it didn’t beat the box-office total of the first Avengers film. Spectre has been subjected to similar feverish hectoring about failing to live up to Skyfall, which in 2012 grossed nearly twice as much as the nearest previous Bond movie. The internet, says Forbes box-office analyst Scott Mendelson, has been the kerosene on this bonfire of the box-office vanities: “It’s the nature of having a bazillion different entertainment news sites that need a consistent flow of content that people will read.

Something must be wrong.’” He sensed the SEO knives being sharpened for Spectre early. “A headline like: ‘Why Spectre is a huge hit but won’t make as much money as Skyfall’ isn’t going to get as much traffic as ‘Can the 007 franchise be saved?’” In this rush to feed the anticipation for hits, very few news outlets treat box-office data rationally, in terms of “the ebb and flow of the market”, Mendelson says. Mendelson says that this state of perpetual anxiety kicked off with The Dark Knight in 2008, which convinced mainstream news outlets such as Forbes that there was “money to be made” in covering geek-centric culture. Given that superhero films were spearheading the industry in financial terms, this meant a boom in box-office speculation – fanned by the horde of digital newcomers. In May 2006, wanting to get publicity for their films on the influential news aggregation site Drudge Report, Sony fed early numbers for The Da Vinci Code to the iconoclastic showbiz reporter Nikki Finke. This, reckons Poland, was the moment when box office data crossed over from the province of industry insiders to internet parlour gossip. “Now people cover it without much awareness of what it is, or how it works,” Poland says.

But, fundamentally, Hollywood is implicated in the wider process. “The studios would prefer this box-office sport not exist,” says Poland. “But given that it’s there, and it’s not going to go away, because you can’t make it go away, they’re working it. And they work it very effectively.” Co-opting a movie’s financial performance for the purposes of publicity is a trick that dates back to the 70s. The Exorcist, Jaws and, most dramatically, Star Wars awakened the US box office from a period of relative dormancy – each busting through the $200m barrier that had seemed impervious since Gone With the Wind took $198.6m domestically in 1939. The dominant mainstream form that emerged was wedded to box office performance, down to the name itself: “There were images in the trade newspapers of people queuing around the block to see them,” remembers Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Rentrak. “The box office was manifested in a visual.

That’s where the term ‘blockbuster’ came from.” Box office-as-publicity became systematic after Tim Burton’s Batman managed a colossal $40.4m opening weekend in 1989. But “Batman taught Hollywood that if it had a movie everybody already wanted to see [in advance], you could make so much money, it didn’t matter if was any good”, says Mendelson. The ensuing obsession with putting bums on seats in the first 72 hours of a film’s release created a culture that fixated on and exploited box-office numbers for publicity – especially first-weekend figures. Sometimes for disingenuous purposes by studios seeking to undermine a rival. “Everybody knows it’s not really in their interests to take down another studio,” says Poland, “because then you get taken down the next week.” But it still happens, whether by deliberately over-inflating expectations, or by pre-emptively establishing the idea of a film as a flop – as befell the Tom Cruise sci-fi extravaganza Edge of Tomorrow in May last year. Early reports of a $25m debut established the narrative, says Mendelson, of “Tom Cruise having a flop; or Tom Cruise being beaten by a girl [Shailene Woodley in The Fault in Our Stars].

Which incidentally is a sexist narrative.” The $178m film, which was comparatively innovative for a blockbuster, story-wise, opened weakly indeed ($28.8m) and eventually took $369.2m, only just making its costs back once prints and advertising are factored in. We’ll never know the true financial picture in Hollywood, because it doesn’t want us to. “There are no DVD numbers and never will be,” says Poland. “There are no VOD numbers and never will be. Since then, another 19 have crossed the mark, with a possible two more (Spectre; The Force Awakens) to do so this year. $1.5bn, as attained by The Avengers, Furious 7 and Jurassic World, is the new $1bn.

Much of the growth has been driven by cinema-building in developing markets such as China, Russia and Mexico, but there is no guarantee that this building will continue. Jonathan Papish, boxoffice.com’s analyst for the country, says he can see early signs of a fever there, too: “Tracking is only just starting to develop in China and predicting is still hard to do well. Since every year at the Chinese box office is seeing tremendous growth, records are broken nearly every month.” Perhaps the best soother for Hollywood would be to concentrate on the quality of its output. Intelligent box-office reporting – spotlighting the complicated set of variables by which a movie sinks or swims, and not making cheap comparisons – can also play a part in moving things beyond opening-weekend mania and towards well-conceived, responsibly budgeted projects. “Box office isn’t poker, it’s blackjack,” says Mendelson. “Movies aren’t always competing against each other, but they are always competing against themselves.”

Here you can write a commentary on the recording "JJ Abrams Explains Why We Need A Female ‘Star Wars’ Protagonist & Here Are 7 …".

* Required fields
Twitter-news
Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

About this site